What’s the Problem with Corporate Food On Campus?
Corporate food systems prioritize profit over students – here’s how that shows up on campus.



At Concordia, food services are controlled by a multinational corporation, Aramark—a company that operates in prisons, stadiums, and institutions around the world. Students have raised concerns about food quality, affordability, worker treatment, and lack of accountability.
This isn’t just about bad meals. It’s about a system where food is treated as a business, not a right. For many residence on campus, you’re required to pay thousands for food you may not even want to eat.
Here’s what’s really going on—and why students are pushing for something better.
The Problem with Corporate Food
- Undercooked or low-quality food
- Limited options (especially dietary + cultural)
- Expensive mandatory meal plans
- Lack of transparency in complaints
- Feeling “locked in” to the system
Students have reported poor quality, lack of variety, and inadequate nutrition
How Aramark ended up on the Concordia campus
Why this matters beyond Concordia
1. Cost-cutting vs. food quality
- Especially visible in prisons and institutional settings
- Allegations of reduced portions, substitutions, or poor ingredients
2. Labour precarity
- Strikes + lawsuits across campuses and stadiums
- Low wages and limited benefits for food service workers
- Limited worker input in decision-making
3. Monopoly / contract power
- Large institutional contracts → limited competition
- Regulators worried about reduced choice and quality
4. Accountability gaps
- Complaints often handled internally
- Limited transparency (especially in campuses and prisons)
5. Ties to Ice
- Aramark has previously held contracts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities.
- Broader concerns about profiting from incarceration and migration control systems
- These contracts have been criticized by advocacy groups due to:
- Conditions in detention centres
- This raises ethical questions about institutional partnerships with corporations involved in such systems.

Recent Aramark Articles at Concordia
Food safety & service failures
- A 2024 performance review in Yosemite National Park gave Aramark its lowest rating, citing rodents, unsafe kitchens, and hazardous conditions (Issues included foodborne illness risks, poor maintenance, and worker safety concerns.)
Labour disputes & strikes
- First-ever strike by concession workers over wages, job security, and automation (AI kiosks replacing staff) (Fenway Park (2025))
- Hundreds of workers struck over low wages and classification issues (Philadelphia arena (2024)
- 99% of union workers voted to authorize a strike (Arizona State University (2025)
Prison food quality & exploitation claims
Lawsuits allege Aramark:
What Students Experience
- Profit-driven contracts
- Cost-cutting on labour + ingredients
- Centralized purchasing (not local/sustainable)
- Mandatory meal plans = captive market
- Limited accountability due to outsourcing
Universities treat food services as a business model tied to profit-sharing contracts
WATCH THIS VIDEO
VIEW FOOD PHOTOS
CHECK OUT THIS WEBSITE
READ THIS ARTICLE
DOWNLOAD THESE ZINES
Why this matters right now
- 67% of Concordia students face food insecurity
- Students are paying thousands for mandatory meal plans
- Campus food programs are struggling to meet demand
- The current food contract is not permanent—it can change
This isn’t just about better meals.
It’s about whether students have a say in the system that feeds them.

What can we do?
- Support student-run food initiatives
- Push for contract transparency and reform through the FAC committee
- Build more campus food co-ops
- Give Feedback about Corporate Cafes and Cafeterias below






